White House Should Heed Biden When Considering Waterways
The Waterways Journal
28 March 2016
Editorial
When Vice President Joe Biden visited the Port of New Orleans on
February 17 to celebrate the seven-year anniversary of the
economic stimulus and to tout the benefits of the port, his
message sounded good. But as Waterways Council, Inc. (WCI)
President and and Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Toohey said
in an op-ed on March 15, “…despite Biden’s words, there is a
significant disconnect between [his] shiny vision and the Obama
administration’s proposed budget for investing in ports and inland
waterways.”
Biden had declared, “We’re going to continue to push to grow
America [and] continue to insist on the United States of America
having the most modern infrastructure in the world.” According to
Toohey, he recognized the importance of our waterways. “Freight
shipments are expected to increase another 62 percent, well over
110 million tons per day in the next two decades,” Biden said,
adding that the inland waterways stretch across 36 states and
generate “hundreds of billions of dollars of growth and capital.”
“Traditionally,” wrote Toohey, “when politicians promote the
importance of infrastructure investment, they focus on roads,
runways and bridges. Biden’s speech was a rare occasion when a
politician paid attention to U.S. waterways, which are a crucial
artery for U.S. goods to reach the world.”
But as Toohey said, there is that unfortunate disconnect between
Biden’s message and the administration’s budget. He suggested that
the White House listen carefully to Biden. “When assessing the
nation’s freight transportation needs, rivers must not be
forgotten,” Toohey wrote.
It is also unfortunate that waterways leaders and waterways
publications like The Waterways Journal to have to keep repeating
the benefits of water transportation. We’ve done it for more than
a century. Transportation officials around the world have
recognized for decades the value of our inland waterways system.
So why doesn’t the administration? Many of the locks and dams that
were built with a shelf life of 50 years under the New Deal under
President Franklin D. Roosevelt are in pitiful condition, due
primarily to the underfunding of the civil works program. Instead
of modernizing the system, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
now operates on a “fix as fail” basis. Repairs sometimes cause
months of delays.
Toohey wrote that if the administration has its way, inland
waterways funding and maintenance (despite their importance) will
decrease significantly. In the fiscal 2016 budget, Congress funded
the Corps’ civil works mission at near record levels with $5.989
billion. The budget, he said, “was a welcome sign that Congress
recognizes there is a backlog of waterways projects that must be
addressed.” For fiscal 2017, the president proposed cutting the
civil works mission funding by 23 percent.
In his op-ed, Toohey listed at length the many reasons why
waterways should be properly funded: (1) The U.S. has 12,000 miles
of navigable, interconnected waterways; (2) In 2014, barges
carried 604 million tons of goods, valued at $232 billion; (3)
Shippers and consumers save $20.37 per ton of cargo compared to
other modes; (4) The waterways support 541,000 jobs worth $29
billion to the U.S. economy; (5) The safety record for inland
operators is 18 times better than rail and 132 times safer than
truck; (6) Towboats are more fuel-efficient and have the cleanest
emissions rate of cargo per ton-mile among all surface modes; and
(7) With new investments, the rivers could support 10,000 to
15,000 jobs just in the construction sector alone. But there are
other towing industry attributes.
Barges lend themselves to the movement of cargoes too heavy and/or
too large to move by truck or rail. When the Corps began selling
off houses that provided residences for lock masters and assistant
lockmasters in the 1970s, some of those structures were moved by
barge. The military has moved equipment at less expense and with
less theft (if any) than when equipment was moved by rail.
One liquid tank barge can hold enough gas to keep about 2,500 cars
running for an entire year. One 15-barge dry cargo tow can keep
1,050 trucks off the highway. Safety improves when highway traffic
is reduced.
Considering the desire to reduce highway congestion, the need to
reduce pollutants, the growing demand for transportation and the
savings that can accrue when shippers are able to use barge
transportation, one wonders how the administration can, year after
year, shortchange the waterways industry. Even when the Harbor
Maintenance Trust Fund brings in $1.6 billion annually, the
administration skims off much of it to effect deficit reduction
and fails to use the money for the purpose for which it was
designed.
While Toohey’s op-ed mirrors arguments made over and over, it
provides a beneficial list for any waterways stakeholders who care
to visit his presentation. Just go to this link:
http://waterwayscouncil.org/featured/why-congress-must-fully-fund-waterway-projects/