More Water Protection From Marcellus Shale Suggested for
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
16 April 2012
By Associated Press
A former top environmental official says Pennsylvania's successful
efforts to keep Marcellus Shale wastewater away from drinking
water supplies should be extended to other oil and gas drillers.
"It's the same industry. It is the same contaminants. And the goal
should be the same," said George Jugovic Jr., former southwest
regional director of the Department of Environmental Protection
and president of PennFuture, an environmental group.
An Associated Press analysis of state data found that in the
second half of 2011, about 1.86 million barrels — or about 78
million gallons — of drilling wastewater from conventional oil and
gas wells were still being sent to treatment plants that discharge
into rivers.
The core issue is whether a problem in waterways has been solved,
or whether more needs to be done.
In 2010, health experts raised alarms when they found soaring
levels of ultra-salty bromides in rivers and streams that are
major sources of drinking water. The general view was that
wastewater from Marcellus Shale gas drilling — polluted with heavy
bromides from deep underground — was contributing to the problem.
High levels of bromides can contaminate drinking water with levels
that exceed national safety standards and are potentially harmful.
Though not considered a pollutant by themselves, the bromides
combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to produce
trihalomethanes, which may cause cancer if ingested over a long
period of time.
Bromide levels were so high in rivers during 2010 that they caused
corrosion at some plants using the water.
But since spring 2011, most Marcellus drillers have been recycling
the fluids or sending then to deep underground wells, mostly in
Ohio.
The gas-rich Marcellus, which lies thousands of feet underground,
has attracted a gold rush of drillers who have drilled almost
5,000 new wells in the past five years. But the state also has
about 70,000 older oil and gas wells that target shallower
reserves, according to DEP statistics.
Researchers say the bromide levels dropped last summer, but they
had expected more of a decline after virtually all of the
Marcellus shale drillers stopped disposing wastewater into plants
that discharge into rivers.
Conventional oil and gas wells weren't included in last year's
recycling push — a loophole that state environmental officials
downplayed at the time.
Jugovic said DEP Secretary Mike Krancer should now take "the next
step" and get voluntary compliance from the rest of the gas
industry.
"It's hard scientifically to justify a distinction between
treating conventional wastewater differently. The wastewater is
being disposed in plants that are not capable of treating those
contaminants," he said.
Dave Mashek, a spokesman for the Pa. Independent Oil & Gas
Association, declined to comment.
DEP spokesman Kevin Sunday said the volume of conventional oil and
gas waste is "substantially smaller" than the Marcellus amounts.
But the AP found that 78 million gallons of oil and gas wastewater
were still being taken to treatment plants in the second half of
2011 — about 33 percent less than the Marcellus quantity that was
raising concerns in 2010, but still a substantial amount. If that
rate continues, the conventional wells will send about 150 million
gallons of the wastewater to treatment plants that discharge into
rivers this year.
Sunday said the agency encourages wastewater recycling,
"regardless of the industry involved," and added that the
conventional oil and gas drillers don't produce as much wastewater
as Marcellus drillers.
Sunday also said the agency has a revised permit to encourage
recycling of waste. Ten facilities have applied for the new
permit; if all are approved, that would double the number of such
facilities in the state.
Environmental Protection Agency spokesman David Sternberg didn't
directly answer a question about whether there was any scientific
justification for treating the non-Marcellus waste differently.
Sternberg said EPA, which urged Pennsylvania regulators last year
to halt the dumping, is working closely with state regulators "to
ensure that, where wastewater treatment facilities are accepting
oil and gas wastewaters, discharges from these treatment
facilities are in compliance with the Clean Water Act."