WV/PA Monongahela Area Watersheds Compact
and
Upper Monongahela River Association
Date: October 4, 2010
Governor Joe Manchin III
State of West Virginia
1900 Kanawha Boulevard, E.
Charleston, WV 25305
RE: Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Marcellus Shale Gas
Development
Urgent action is needed to protect the watersheds of West Virginia. A
similar situation as severe exists in southwestern and northeastern
Pennsylvania. Hundreds of thousands of acres in these States are in
various stages of exploration and development in the Marcellus shale
for natural gas extraction.
The attention that this overall situation has received, or is planned
to receive, by State governments is inadequate in the view of more than
twenty watershed groups and conservation organizations. And, the
program review in the Office of Oil and Gas as well as the Panel
recently selected by WV-DEP to study the situation are not an adequate
response given the magnitude of the problems at issue. The Morgantown
Dominion Post newspaper was quick to see the substantive bias in
affiliations of the Panel members (6 of 9 represent the gas industry
under review), as described in the enclosed Editorial. There may well
be some changes in State laws needed by the industry; however, the
issues faced by the common citizens are extensive and severe and not
appropriately represented by the panel. Nor are these issues being
adequately addressed by the two State governments, given current
practices or plans. The Editorial states “the fox has been put in
charge of the hen house.” Watershed and conservation groups are
explicitly and conspicuously absent from the Panel.
The WV/PA Monongahela Area Watersheds Compact was formed on August 17,
2010, with a second meeting taking place in Morgantown on September
22nd. This new Watershed Compact includes the Upper Monongahela River
Association (UMRA) and other groups that have operated for many
years. UMRA has coordinated monthly meetings on these gas well
drilling issues for two years with interested and affected parties
including industry and government representatives. Some eight
Resolutions have been approved by this Compact to date, four at each
meeting. These eight Resolutions are attached to this letter for your
use. We believe these represent an essential response, in part, to the
current issues involving Marcellus shale development and extraction in
West Virginia.
We seek the implementation of remedies for the current problems in the
Monongahela River watershed, the current problems in Wetzel and
Marshall counties, and the projected problems on the horizon for our
State and for Pennsylvania relative to natural gas exploration,
development, production and transmission particularly in the Marcellus
shale. We are convinced that the long-term condition of our Region is
at significant risk at this time, so remedies are needed as soon as
they can possibly be put into effect.
We seek (1) a meeting with you, (2) a review and adjustment of the
composition of the Marcellus Panel recently appointed, and (3)
positions for conservation groups such as ours on the various Advisory
Committees within State government that deal with the diverse aspects
of water resources, water quality, sediment prevention and erosion
control.
Further, we request that our Compact or some of its members be
represented on the new Panel and on the appropriate Advisory
Committees. We also feel it is reasonable to ask for a
response from your Office regarding the eight resolutions
attached. Otherwise, the input and participation of the
public including our diverse watershed groups and conservation
organizations will not be fairly and appropriately served and citizens
of our region will be further harmed and under represented.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane G. Nichols, Compact
Co-Chair
Barry
G. Pallay, Compact Co-Chair
and President of
CLEAR
and
Vice President of UMRA
WV/PA Monongahela Area Watersheds
Compact Upper Monongahela
River Association
330 Dream Catcher
Circle
109
Broad Street, P. O. Box 519
Morgantown, WV
26508
Granville
WV 26534-0519
cc: WV/PA Watershed Groups, US-EPA, US-ACE, USGS, WV-DEP, Gov. Rendell,
PA-DEP
Attachments (2). Editorial and Resolutions.
Attachment 1
Morgantown Dominion Post, Page 10-A, Monday, September
27, 2010:
EDITORIAL: “Task force far too up to its task”
“Lopsided appointments of gas industry reps cause for concern about
drilling”
Talk about putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. And in this case,
it’s a hungry fox to boot. At least that’s the perception we got from
last week’s appointment of six natural gas company representatives to a
new nine-member task force to help the state better regulate the
industry. We realize that this panel, appointed by the state’s director
of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), will not actually
be writing the regulations and legislation on how to regulate this
industry. Or at least that’s what we are being led to believe.
The DEP’s staff will be charged with that task, while this panel will
attempt to reach a consensus on the issues. That might not be too hard
to do, considering the only real differences of opinion will come from
the lone representative of the West Virginia Environmental Council and
an advocate for landowner’s rights. The ninth member of the panel is a
coal industry lawyer, who represents the West Virginia Coal
Association.
No one should overestimate the scope and authority of this task force,
however, we can assure the DEP and this group that we’ll be watching.
Clearly, the state needs to determine how to better regulate our
booming natural gas industry. We also understand the logic of
considering a dual regulatory system — one for conventional gas
drilling and another for the burgeoning Marcellus shale drilling.
And no one is questioning why there should be industry representatives
on this task force. However, the number of appointments of executives
and lawyers for this industry is weighed far too heavily in the
industry’s favor.
With all due respect to these industry appointees, some who have served
in public regulatory roles, too, these appointments raise eyebrows.
Yes, they bring diverse outlooks, technical knowledge and pragmatic
advice to the table, but they also bring their industry’s primary goal
to the head of the well: Their profit margin.
No one here is opposed to that, but regulation of this industry must
balance a return on investment with reasonable regulation and
oversight.
Otherwise, these drilling operations may pose dangerous risks to our
state’s aquifer, our waterways, our roads, our landscape and
landowners’ rights.
This panel’s lopsided make-up leads us to believe there’s reason to
fear all of that.
We urge the DEP to review the composition of this panel and even
appoint someone who isn’t a stakeholder to this task force before the
chickens come home to roost.
Attachment 2
RESOLUTIONS [ADOPTED AUGUST 17TH AND SEPTEMBER 22ND 2010]
WV/PA MONONGAHELA AREA WATERSHEDS COMPACT
We recognize the value of mineral extraction, including coal, oil, gas
and water, in the Monongahela basin and adjoining areas, when conducted
responsibly. But, the current and projected levels of Marcellus
shale drilling for natural gas production and the manner in which it is
being conducted poses very serious problems for most all of West
Virginia and Pennsylvania.
RESOLUTIONS, FIRST WV-PA WATERSHED MEETING, AUGUST 17, 2010
1. The West Virginia and Pennsylvania DEPs must enact commensurate and
enforceable standards and rules/regulations and adequate penalties to
protect regional water resources from potential hazards caused by
mineral extraction and oil and gas drilling, including but not limited
to sedimentation, water withdrawal, organic and inorganic chemicals and
thermal effects.
2. The West Virginia and Pennsylvania DEPs must hire an additional and
adequate number of inspectors and other staff to effectively monitor
and enforce regulations governing mining and the oil and gas well
industries.
3. The Upper Monongahela watershed groups advocate that closed-loop
systems for containment of blowback water be required at all new
construction gas well drilling sites rather than the open pit system of
containment.
4. If open pits exist or are absolutely necessary, these should provide
sufficient natural or geosynthetic protection to both contain the
blowback water and to prevent its percolation into the soil or
groundwater beneath the pit should the containment liner become
ruptured. Further, we advocate the usage of regulations typically found
in state dam safety statutes in order to ensure that blowback pits are
properly sited and constructed, and that emergency contact/notification
procedures are implemented when an accident involving the release of
blowback water occurs.
RESOLUTIONS, SECOND WV/PA MONONGAHELA AREA WATERSHEDS COMPACT,
SEPTEMBER 22, 2010
5.West Virginia and Pennsylvania rivers and streams frequently
experience very low flows because of reduced rainfall. At these
critically low flows, water withdrawals for Marcellus Shale gas well
activities threaten aquatic life in many streams. And, more generally,
the waters of both States must be shared among the diverse uses from
agriculture to industry to recreation to domestic use. This includes
both surface and sub-surface water resources. Therefore, the withdrawal
of water from any source for high volume applications as Marcellus
Shale drilling, fracking or other operations must be regulated and
require permits from an appropriate State agency.
6. The Program Review in the Office of Oil and Gas of the WV DEP is
clearly useful with a projected Final Report date of December 2010.
However, this Review of oil and gas exploration and production
activities in West Virginia is inadequate in and of itself. The issues
and problems of this industry sector are huge and diverse and they
directly involve many other agencies of State government; and, these
problems are interrelated to the other extractive industries. A
state-wide review is urgently needed, one that is directed from the
Office of the Governor. And, a Special Session of the WV Legislature
would appear to be called for to address these problems and issues that
include the protection of our water, air and land as well as our roads,
our scenic values and quality of life. Each extractive activity should
be responsible for the cost of all the environmental and socio-economic
impacts resulting from its activities, taking into account both short
and long-term impacts.
7. The issues and problems affecting WV and PA as a result of the
current and projected levels of activity for coal mining and natural
gas production are of an inter-state or national character. Here in
northern WV and southwestern PA we have many such operations that cross
state lines. One major issue is the drinking water for approximately
one million people in southwestern Pennsylvania that comes from the
Monongahela River, which drains most of northcentral WV. This and the
other streams will likely increase in their total loads of pollutants.
Therefore, the US Environmental Protection Agency in conjunction with
the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Geological Survey and other
federal agencies should prepare a “guidance document” and respond
quickly to the water and aqueous waste problems of the extractive
industries now affecting New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and
other States.
8. An Interagency Task Force study within the United States government
is needed to examine the existing problems posed by the extractive
industries in the United States. This would aim to establish a viable
long range Planning Office that can anticipate many of the problems
such as those posed by Marcellus Shale gas exploration and production.
The focus would be on environment impacts and socio-economic
dislocations such as public infrastructure damages and domestic
disturbance problems.
NOTE: The above Resolutions were adopted by consensus at the First and
Second WV-PA Watershed Group Meetings on August 17, 2010 and September
22, 2010 at the Morgantown Airport. These meetings were organized and
conducted by the representatives of various watershed and conservation
groups in cooperation with the Upper Monongahela River Association
(www.uppermon.org).