Leaky Tank's Design, Age Probed
Vessel Dates to 1938, Built With Rivets, Not Welds
Wall Street Journal
16 January 2014
By Valerie Bauerlein and Cameron McWhirter
CHARLESTON, W.Va.—As probes develop into a chemical spill here
that tainted the water supply, investigators are looking at the
design, age and maintenance of the tank that failed, a nondescript
storage container sealed with rivets and installed in 1938.
Experts in storage-tank construction say modern standards and
testing are much stricter than they used to be, and almost all
large steel tanks are now welded, not held together with rivets.
But an untold number of smaller companies across the country still
store chemicals in older, riveted tanks, they say.
Such tanks are "just an accident waiting to happen," said Koulis
Kyriakou, manager of Steelcraft Inc.'s Clemmer Containment
Division in Canada, which makes storage tanks but not the one in
Charleston.
Freedom Industries Inc., the tank's owner, was required under
state law to have a groundwater-protection plan. State
environmental officials said Wednesday they have no record of such
a plan. State regulation also requires the company to have a
containment structure around its tanks sufficient to contain a
spill for at least 72 hours.
A representative of Freedom Industries declined to comment.
On Jan. 9, inspectors said they discovered some 7,500 gallons of
the chemical had leaked through a one-inch hole in the tank and
flowed through a damaged containment wall into the nearby Elk
River. Some 300,000 people in the area were left without water for
drinking, bathing and other uses for five days. Some still don't
have water and most area schools remain closed.
The company wouldn't answer questions Wednesday about whether the
tank had been upgraded or how it was maintained. On Friday,
Freedom President Gary Southern said the site's tanks were "looked
at" on a regular basis. "We have people at the tanks every day,"
he said.
From 1938 to 2001, the tank stored bulk oil, according to a 2002
environmental review done for its former owner. Since at least
2007, it stored the chemical that spilled, 4-methylcyclohexane
methanol, also known as MCHM, according to an annual chemical
inventory filed with the state.
Age and upkeep likely were factors in its failure, experts said.
While rivets commonly were used in tanks in the 1930s and 1940s,
advanced welding is the modern standard, according to Fred Ruinen,
corporate sales manager at Fisher Tank Co. of Chester, Pa.
Industry standards today call for X-ray tests of a tank's seals,
water tests to find leaks, layered bottoms, liners to help keep
the seal, leak sensors and secure containment areas, Mr. Ruinen
said.
Many riveted tanks are being replaced because rivets can corrode
over time, said Matt Van Alsburg, account manager at Wellington,
Colo.-based Advance Tank & Construction Co. Other older tanks
are being retrofitted to meet modern standards, he said.
Large companies, especially in the booming U.S. energy industry,
are investing in major storage improvements, but some smaller
businesses aren't because upgrading tanks or building new ones is
expensive and companies lose revenue while tanks are offline, he
said. "It's a costly endeavor," Mr. Van Alsburg said. "In a lot of
cases, we may just not hear from them."
Mike Dorsey, chief of homeland security and emergency response for
West Virginia's Department of Environmental Protection, said last
week that Freedom "intended to upgrade" its old tanks but hadn't
done so.
Some states regulate what can be stored in riveted tanks, said
Wayne Geyer, executive vice president of the Steel Tank Institute,
an Illinois-based trade group. Missouri regulations required
riveted tanks storing flammable and combustible liquids to be
removed from service by the end of 2005, according to the Missouri
Department of Agriculture.
Federal environmental laws regulate oil products in aboveground
tanks. However, MCHM likely wouldn't be covered, said several
chemical experts. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency said the agency is investigating the leak. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which covers
workplace safety, also is investigating.
State DEP officials said Wednesday they had cited Freedom
Industries on Tuesday for alleged violations at sister plant Poca
Blending LLC, in Nitro, a town about 15 miles from Charleston,
where Freedom has been moving some stores of MCHM. The state
alleged the company failed to provide "appropriate" secondary
containment for tanks and failed to perform mandated
self-inspections, among other things. "The [safety] plan indicates
that the building itself acts as secondary containment, but holes
exist at floor level in the building's walls," inspectors wrote.
The storage of MCHM isn't included in the Clean Air Act and isn't
tracked by the Department of Homeland Security's program that
keeps tabs on hazardous-chemical storage.
After last year's fertilizer explosion in West, Texas, which
killed 15 people, President Barack Obama set up a task force to
review chemical storage regulations, but the group's final
recommendations haven't been announced.
—Jennifer Levitz, Alexandra Berzon and Kris Maher contributed to
this article.